- #PNB FORECLOSED PROPERTIES IN PANGASINAN 2018 FULL#
- #PNB FORECLOSED PROPERTIES IN PANGASINAN 2018 TRIAL#
She also alleged that she only received P80,000.00 from Bulatao, contrary to the P200,000.00 contracted loan amount. She asserted that, in grave abuse of her rights, took advantage of her financial distress and urgent financial needs by imposing in the an interest of five percent (5%) per month which is excessive, iniquitous, unconscionable, exorbitant and contrary to public policy, rendering the contract null and void.
#PNB FORECLOSED PROPERTIES IN PANGASINAN 2018 TRIAL#
The Notice of Sale on Extra Judicial Foreclosure of Property/ies was issued by the Office of the Clerk of Court of the trial court in Agoo, La Union on July 15, 2011.īy reason of the impending sale of the subject property, filed 5 seeking to declare the as illegal, inexistent and null and void, and to make the contract unenforceable. When defaulted in her obligation, foreclosed the mortgage and petitioned the court for the sale of the subject property in a public auction.
#PNB FORECLOSED PROPERTIES IN PANGASINAN 2018 FULL#
OTHERWISE, it shall remain in full force and effect and shall be enforceable in the manner provided for by law.
PROVIDED HOWEVER, that if I, shall pay or cause to be paid to the said MORTGAGEE the aforementioned amount of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (Php200,000.00), Philippine currency together with the interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per month, within a period of twelve (12) months or one (1) year or before June 4, 2009, then this MORTGAGE shall thereby be discharged and of no effect.
Tomas, La Union, with an area of 42,727 square meters (subject property), as security for a loan in the amount of P200,000.00. On June 3, 2008, executed a Deed of Mortgage of Real Property in favor of covering a parcel of land located in Pongpong, Sto. The CA Decision narrates the factual antecedents as follows: CA Decision partly granted the appeal of respondent Zenaida Estonactoc (Zenaida) resulting in the reversal and setting aside of the Decision 4 dated rendered by the Regional Trial Court, Branch 31, Agoo, La Union (RTC) in Civil Case No. Bulatao) assailing the Decision 2 dated Octo(Decision) of the Court of Appeals 3 (CA) in CA-G.R. ESTONACTOC, RESPONDENT.īefore the Court is the Appeal 1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Atty.
0 kommentar(er)
